NJAC develops and implements training and curriculum to ensure that the next generation of legal professionals is prepared to protect civil rights.
NJAC also helps local, state and national lawmakers, community organizations, educational institutions and others learn how fight antisemitism.
Established in partnership with dozens of organizations and law firms, the NJAC Institute for Litigation Coordination ensures that efforts are not duplicated, best practices are proliferated, and resources are allocated strategically.
What We Do
National Jewish Advocacy Center, Inc. (NJAC) Is a Leader in Combatting Antisemitism Through Innovative Legal Solutions That Drive Change Through Laws and Policy. We Are a Nonpartisan Organization With Supporters Across the Political Spectrum.
NJAC leverages its experience, expertise and our Nation’s legal system to combat the rising epidemic of antisemitic activity.
The NJAC Institute for Litigation Coordination ensures that efforts are not duplicated, best practices are proliferated, and resources are allocated strategically.
NJAC develops and implements training and curriculum to ensure that the next generation of legal professionals is prepared to protect civil rights.
In Memory of
Daniel Raphael Paluch
Daniel Raphael Paluch, zichrono livracha, was an outstanding litigator, an accomplished advocate, and a devoted family man. He served as counsel with NJAC on important cases protecting the Jewish people before his sudden passing on July 8, 2025.
NJAC Secures Major Legal Wins, Takes on Landmark Harvard Case, and Leads the Fight Against Antisemitism
NJAC Leverages Its Experience, Expertise and Our Nation’s Legal System to Combat the Rising Epidemic of Antisemitic Activity.
NJAC’s Federal Cases
Aloof v. Pokemon
The National Jewish Advocacy Center (NJAC) today announced the filing of a federal civil rights lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging unlawful discrimination against a Jewish Israeli-American competitive player in organized Pokémon tournaments.
StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice v. CODEPINK et al
Alleging Defendants organized a violent riot outside of Adas Torah synagogue in Los Angeles, CA, and blocked the entrance to the house of worship in violation of the both the state and federal FACE Acts.
Jan v. People Media Project, d/b/a Palestine Chronicle
Alleging Palestine Chronicle knowingly used and paid known Hamas associates embedded with Hamas, including an official Hamas spokesman who held and tortured Israeli hostages in his home, to spread Hamas propaganda, in violation of the Antiterrorism Act.
Lavi v. UNRWA USA National Committee, Inc.
Alleging UNRWA USA is aware that UNRWA works with and for Hamas by providing operational and financial support for their activities, and UNRWA USA aids, abets, and provides material support for those activities under the guise of humanitarian assistance in violation of the Antiterrorism Act.
Gess v. Bam Trading Services Inc, d/b/a Binance
Alleging Binance knowingly facilitated transfers of money to Hamas over the course of five years, and C-suite individuals and employees knew that operations were being used to fund Hamas and failed to file a suspicious activity report with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network in violation of the Bank Secrecy Act.
Parizer v. AJP Educational Foundation Inc.
Alleging AJP Educational Foundation Inc. and National Students for Justice in Palestine, which controls the various SJP campus chapters, coordinates with FTO’s to influence students “to serve as foot soldiers for Hamas on campus and beyond,” in violation of the Antiterrorism Act.
Newman v. The Associated Press: Alleging the Associated Press (“AP”) knowingly used and paid known Hamas associates embedded with Hamas in order to post real-time photographs of the atrocities of October 7, in violation of the Antiterrorism Act.
